Crap Throwing Clavin Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 5 hours ago, Ann said: There was never any good law enforcement reason for ANY of this. It's entirely political. 2 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyst Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 Trump landed in Greensboro at 1pm. His appearance is scheduled at 2pm. NCSHP helicopter and a caravan drove 90+ mph to get him to his speech - normally a 40-45 minute drive - in less than 30. traffic all around the airport was shut down. anyone who went to lunch at work got shafted with roads being deadlocked. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 15 minutes ago, Boyst said: Trump landed in Greensboro at 1pm. His appearance is scheduled at 2pm. NCSHP helicopter and a caravan drove 90+ mph to get him to his speech - normally a 40-45 minute drive - in less than 30. traffic all around the airport was shut down. anyone who went to lunch at work got shafted with roads being deadlocked. When Obama was president, this was called "a day ending in Y" in CA. Hell, you already have a problem on the freeways there. But the minute Obama needed some Hollywood cash, the plebes would get shafted trying to get home from work. Of course, he still won CA by about 98%. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 21 Share Posted August 21 On Election Day 2022--exactly 3 months after the armed FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago, Lil' Jay Bratt, in a decidedly different tone than his records and motions in Trump's case, explains how (allegedly) DOJ came to learn of classified papers at Penn Biden Center. (Team Biden's search for docs started in May 2022 after FBI opened a formal investigation into Donald Trump) This was withheld from the public as Americans were voting in crucial midterms. Democrats knew Republicans would take the House and open a separate investigation. Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith a week later; he appointed Robert Hur in Jan 2023. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 58 minutes ago, Ann said: It's all the same charges with only a few things deleted from the original indictment. Then they claim all is good because they told the new GJ about immunity but they voted to charge him anyway because #orangemanbad and must be stopped or it will be the end of our democracy blah-blah-blah.... Smith needs to be indicted for falsification of records and impersonating a prosecutor. Why hasn't the House ordered the Sgt at Arms to arrest his ass? 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 A whistleblower complaint about Jack Smith laundering and extorting money (from November 2023) 118 pages Dear Mr Horowitz: Enclosed with this letter si a whistleblower complaint being filed by my client, John F. Moynihan. Copies of this complaint are also being sent ot the Inspector General of the United States Department of State, hte Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Office of Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, and the Office of Professional Responsibility of the United States Department of Justice. Mr. Moynihan, a former employee of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, si a recognized expert ni the areas of money laundering and financial investigations. This complaint is a result of his investigation into the allegations contained therein. As stated ni the complaint, your office (and the offices of those copied herein) is most suited ot further the investigation into the claims of the affiants as compiled by Mr. Moynihan. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devnull Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 3 hours ago, Ann said: "forbids" is such a strong word. Perhaps a better interpretation for Modern Audiences is "suggests" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 2 hours ago, devnull said: "forbids" is such a strong word. Perhaps a better interpretation for Modern Audiences is "suggests" “may never” From the manual </snip> Federal prosecutors and agents may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party. Such a purpose is inconsistent with the Department’s mission and with the Principles of Federal Prosecution. See § 9-27.260. Any action likely to raise an issue or the perception of an issue under this provision requires consultation with the Public Integrity Section, and such action shall not be taken if the Public Integrity Section advises that further consultation is required with the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General. </snip> 1 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 1 hour ago, Ann said: “may never” From the manual </snip> Federal prosecutors and agents may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party. Such a purpose is inconsistent with the Department’s mission and with the Principles of Federal Prosecution. See § 9-27.260. Any action likely to raise an issue or the perception of an issue under this provision requires consultation with the Public Integrity Section, and such action shall not be taken if the Public Integrity Section advises that further consultation is required with the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General. </snip> Since it explicitly says "for the purpose of," the counter-argument to that is "That's not why I did it!" And in this case, it's easy to get that counter-argument to stick, given that it's a re-indictment, "and the original indictment wasn't intended to give Harris an advantage." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 4 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said: Since it explicitly says "for the purpose of," the counter-argument to that is "That's not why I did it!" And in this case, it's easy to get that counter-argument to stick, given that it's a re-indictment, "and the original indictment wasn't intended to give Harris an advantage." The original indictment was to help the Democrat candidate. This indictment is to help the Democrat candidate. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 2 hours ago, Ann said: The original indictment was to help the Democrat candidate. This indictment is to help the Democrat candidate. Yes, but 46 ISN'T Harris. And THAT's who was helped by the 1st indictment. Sheesh. What ELSE MUST you lie about if you'd lie about how it was done to help Harris. /ATOP (most likely) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 33 minutes ago, Ann said: The original indictment was to help the Democrat candidate. This indictment is to help the Democrat candidate. You know that. I know that. That doesn't mean they wouldn't argue that, based on timing ("There was no candidate at the time to aid. 'Candidate' requires a race.") And that the argument won't stick for the same reason. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fansince88 Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 (edited) 13 hours ago, Ann said: “may never” From the manual </snip> Federal prosecutors and agents may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party. Such a purpose is inconsistent with the Department’s mission and with the Principles of Federal Prosecution. See § 9-27.260. Any action likely to raise an issue or the perception of an issue under this provision requires consultation with the Public Integrity Section, and such action shall not be taken if the Public Integrity Section advises that further consultation is required with the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General. </snip> What part of shornt do you not understand? https://youtu.be/LAAFvkcIALs?si=EYEHyYMqPL7W0lRR Edited August 29 by Fansince88 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 So if you listen to this, Trump doesn't say specifically that he is going to vote for the abortion free-for-all getting ready to be on the Florida ballot. He just says he will vote against a six week ban because it's not enough time. But it's either six weeks, or the full term, according to the bill. So unfortunately, he just said he's voting in favor of the bill, which lets people abort babies to viability. Unfortunately, the law also, apparently, includes no consent needed for children, and pathways for state funding of the abortions. Here's hoping he changes his tune because this is not a very good look. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.