Ann Posted June 7, 2023 Share Posted June 7, 2023 I am not sure how much Bill Barr's word is worth, buuutt... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 Click it for the full commentary 2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 Not sure what MTG says in the video (it's a rare "in office" day and I don't have headphones to listen to it right now), so maybe this is repeating it, but: 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 All this means is Trump will be indicted for something. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 Commander in Thief 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 Looks like some on the right are ready to fight. Anyone heard from McConnell about this? Didn't think so. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 1 hour ago, Ann said: All this means is Trump will be indicted for something. Hmm, the Communists have a pretty good grasp of the news cycle, so I'm surprised it's on a Friday. Although, since the Communists also own the MSM I guess it's not like it's going to *ever* disappear from the headlines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 2 hours ago, Hedge said: Hmm, the Communists have a pretty good grasp of the news cycle, so I'm surprised it's on a Friday. Although, since the Communists also own the MSM I guess it's not like it's going to *ever* disappear from the headlines. At the end of the week, of course, so they avoid the full week news cycle, but get the talking points out for the Sunday morning circuit. It's not justice, it's theater. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 2 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted June 12, 2023 Author Share Posted June 12, 2023 Should have been a 5-week investigation, not 5 years... 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe, HunterBiden was allegedly paid $5M by a high-level Burisma executive as part of a bribery scheme Sen. Chuck Grassley said Monday that the Burisma executive who allegedly paid Joe Biden and Hunter Biden kept 17 audio recordings of his conversations with them as an "insurance policy," citing the FBI FD-1023 form that the bureau briefed congressional lawmakers on. Grassley, R-Iowa, revealed from the Senate floor Monday what was said to be a redacted reference in the FBI-generated FD-1023 form alleging a criminal bribery scheme between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a foreign national that involved influence over U.S. policy decisions. </snip> 4 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted June 12, 2023 Share Posted June 12, 2023 "Big trouble?" Nawww they won't be. Should be, won't be. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 55 minutes ago, Ann said: "Big trouble?" Nawww they won't be. Should be, won't be. The FBI can redact information in congressional briefs if it's deemed to sensitive - e.g. if it divulges technical means or sources related to counter-intel data gathering. And if the congressional briefs are to be widely disseminated - e.g. to the entire House Oversight committee. They'd still have to brief committee leadership privately, though, on the unredacted brief. Of course, that doesn't mean they didn't abuse that privilege by redacting shit that shouldn't have been redacted. Or that they did brief leadership. I'm just pointing out that it's not a definitive case of suppressing evidence without further information. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 Okay, I'll say it. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bullsh*t ! Second day of dental work forces Joe Biden to cancel White House events. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/06/12/joe-biden-root-canal-procedure-cancels-white-house-events/7031686591629/ 1 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Okay, I'll say it. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bullsh*t ! Second day of dental work forces Joe Biden to cancel White House events. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/06/12/joe-biden-root-canal-procedure-cancels-white-house-events/7031686591629/ So he had a root canal dome on Sunday? Wasn't that gay funday? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Okay, I'll say it. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bullsh*t ! Second day of dental work forces Joe Biden to cancel White House events. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/06/12/joe-biden-root-canal-procedure-cancels-white-house-events/7031686591629/ Y'know...I had a root canal last year. Mutant tooth - abnormally long molar roots, with an extra root going off at a 90-degree angle. Dentist refused to do it, sent me to an endodontal specialist. Took her three hours and ten CT scans to just plan the procedure. Couldn't use power tools, had to go old school and manually file out the root. Ruined five different tungsten files. Was her only patient for the day. Was truly the root canal from hell. Was fine the next day. Yeah, this story is complete bullshit. Or the specialists from Walter Reed are complete idiots. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 34 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said: The FBI can redact information in congressional briefs if it's deemed to sensitive - e.g. if it divulges technical means or sources related to counter-intel data gathering. And if the congressional briefs are to be widely disseminated - e.g. to the entire House Oversight committee. They'd still have to brief committee leadership privately, though, on the unredacted brief. Of course, that doesn't mean they didn't abuse that privilege by redacting shit that shouldn't have been redacted. Or that they did brief leadership. I'm just pointing out that it's not a definitive case of suppressing evidence without further information. Your right, they can redact if it has to do with national security however that is pure bullshit in this case. What they redacted has to do with the criminality of an illegally sitting (p)resident and it should have already been brough to Congress attention instead of only giving it up by pulling Wray teeth to get it I'm frigging disgusted 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, Cinga said: Your right, they can redact if it has to do with national security however that is pure bullshit in this case. What they redacted has to do with the criminality of an illegally sitting (p)resident and it should have already been brough to Congress attention instead of only giving it up by pulling Wray teeth to get it I'm frigging disgusted We don't actually know that's what was redacted. I'm certainly willing to accept that as a hypothesis. But what we think and what we know are two different things. Big problem is that we can't know without seeing the unredacted documents. Which we'll never see. The veil of secrecy surrounding this is worse than the actual redaction. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.