Jump to content
Bills Fans Gear Now Available! ×

Biden Investigations


Foxx

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

We don't actually know that's what was redacted.  I'm certainly willing to accept that as a hypothesis.  But what we think and what we know are two different things.

 

Big problem is that we can't know without seeing the unredacted documents.  Which we'll never see.  The veil of secrecy surrounding this is worse than the actual redaction.  

 

Here is what we do know however. The FBI by the 1023 knowingly have been withholding evidence of treason from Congress and the American People. By definition that means Wray and anyone else in the FBI that knew of this is an accessory to treason and should be charged as such. At this point, the tapes are just evidence of the fact

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jabba The Hutt
2 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Y'know...I had a root canal last year.  Mutant tooth - abnormally long molar roots, with an extra root going off at a 90-degree angle.  Dentist refused to do it, sent me to an endodontal specialist.  Took her three hours and ten CT scans to just plan the procedure.  Couldn't use power tools, had to go old school and manually file out the root.  Ruined five different tungsten files.  Was her only patient for the day.  Was truly the root canal from hell.  

 

Was fine the next day.

 

Yeah, this story is complete bullshit.  Or the specialists from Walter Reed are complete idiots.

 

 

Done tons of root canals and surgeries with Harvard endodontists/surgeons and NEVER have I seen somebody out of commission for multiple days from ANY procedure.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jabba The Hutt said:

Done tons of root canals and surgeries with Harvard endodontists/surgeons and NEVER have I seen somebody out of commission for multiple days from ANY procedure.

 

Maybe the pain killer affected Xiden brain.... oh wait, that's not possible...... never mind.... 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Almost certain this pressure/leak is coming from DoD intelligence branches. 

 

 

 

Russian election interference/misinformation to help their Russian asset Trump coming in 3 - 2 - 1 aaaaannnnddddd GO!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

We don't actually know that's what was redacted.  I'm certainly willing to accept that as a hypothesis.  But what we think and what we know are two different things.

 

Big problem is that we can't know without seeing the unredacted documents.  Which we'll never see.  The veil of secrecy surrounding this is worse than the actual redaction.  

 

I don't know why we can't just blindly trust the FBI to make appropriate redactions. I mean, it's the same agency that correctly redacted the fact that they spent $75,000+ on a conference table on the grounds of national security so that it wouldn't become public that they were wasting tax dollars on frivolous things...

 

Oh wait.

  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
58 minutes ago, Koko said:

 

I don't know why we can't just blindly trust the FBI to make appropriate redactions. I mean, it's the same agency that correctly redacted the fact that they spent $75,000+ on a conference table on the grounds of national security so that it wouldn't become public that they were wasting tax dollars on frivolous things...

 

Oh wait.

 

That's why they have oversight - specifically, why they have the oversight of a select few Congressional leaders who get to see the unredacted briefs.  

 

Still easily subject to abuse.  You have the oversight of only four elected officials?  Overseeing a bureau that can and will go after them if they don't toe the line?  

  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Weissman was overseeing this case in the Fall of 2016 and buried it. A few months later, he was running the Russia collusion hoax against Trump.

(May 30, 2020)

 

Ex-Ukrainian President’s Aide Opens Up on Biden Tapes, Democrats' Money Laundering

Two weeks ago, a Ukrainian lawmaker released excerpts from alleged conversations between ex-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and former US Vice President Joe Biden, with the tapes detailing Biden’s effort to pressure Kiev into dropping a criminal probe into his son’s activities in Ukraine. Now, the man who made the tapes has come forward.
 

Between 2014 and 2016, Oleksandr Onyshchenko was former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko's right hand man. When he began to pick up on the corrupt behaviour taking place in the president's office, Onyshchenko began secretly recording telephone conversations and making copies of potentially incriminating documents.
 

</snip>
 

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats Doubling Down On Biden Bribery
Lies Suggests They’re Prepping For The Next Leak

The Federalist, by Margot Cleveland

 

Original Article

 

House Democrats keep lying about the FBI’s handling of a “highly credible” confidential human source (CHS), who reported that the Ukrainian owner of Burisma bragged about paying then-Vice President Joe Biden a $5 million bribe. Their persistence suggests the FBI is poised to peddle selectively leaked documents to cover up its political favoritism and interference in the 2020 election. On Friday, Democrat Ro Khanna went on Fox News to discuss the scandal surrounding the FD-1023 form that implicated Biden in a bribery scandal. Khanna, a member of the House Oversight Committee, along with other committee members, had reviewed the FD-1023 the previous day.

 

 

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deranged Rhino

But remember, none of this corruption played ANY role in what's happening in Ukraine today. And suggesting that it did, or that our leadership has ulterior motives to drag out the conflict rather than seek a diplomatic offramp, makes you a "conspiracy theorist".

 

 

(of course in today's parlance, being a conspiracy theorist just means you're ahead of the narrative curve)

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Cheers 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


"No one is stonewalling." Won't answer any questions, Congressional committees needed a subpoena just to get redacted information, and the FBI sat on this information since 2016. Nope, not stonewalling at all. 🤪

  • Like 3
  • Cheers 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

1 hour ago, Ann said:


"No one is stonewalling." Won't answer any questions, Congressional committees needed a subpoena just to get redacted information, and the FBI sat on this information since 2016. Nope, not stonewalling at all. 🤪

 

This is obstruction of justice, plain and simple and they all need to be prosecuted for it

  • Cheers 4
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Cinga said:

 

 

This is obstruction of justice, plain and simple and they all need to be prosecuted for it

 

No doubt that the DOJ will get right on that.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
2 hours ago, Foxx said:

 

Yeah, SBU (Sensitive but Unclassified) is a real thing.  

 

As a side note, I wouldn't be surprised of some of the "classified" documents in Trump's indictment are SBU.

  • Cheers 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Guidelines