Jump to content
Bills Fans Gear Now Available! ×

Biden Investigations


Foxx

Recommended Posts

BREAKING

 

We just received a letter from the Special Counsel to the President making it clear the White House intends to continue obstructing our investigation.

 

If President Biden has nothing to hide, then he should make his current and former staff available to testify before Congress about his mishandling of classified documents.

 

Our investigation has unearthed new facts that contradict the White House’s and President Biden’s personal attorney’s narrative of the events. We also need to know if these classified materials aided the Bidens’ global influence peddling enterprise that brought in tens of millions for the Bidens and their associates.

 

Instead of fulfilling President Biden’s pledge to have the most transparent administration in history, the White House is withholding over 82,000 pages of emails where Joe Biden used a pseudonym when he was Vice President, refuses to provide proof that Joe Biden loaned his brother money, and now seeks to block the Bidens, their associates, and current and former White House staff from testifying before Congress.

 

This obstruction does not deter us, and we will continue to follow the facts and hold President Biden accountable to the American people.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
11 hours ago, Foxx said:

Raskin

 

 

Raskin knows that in a public hearing, Hunter can decline answers due to national security. He also knows that, in a private hearing, not so much...


In a private hearing, coordinating answers among those subpoenaed is more difficult to do. 
 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ann said:


In a private hearing, coordinating answers among those subpoenaed is more difficult to do. 
 

Let him have his public hearing... after his closed-door deposition.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billsandhorns
13 hours ago, Foxx said:

Raskin

 

 

Raskin knows that in a public hearing, Hunter can decline answers due to national security. He also knows that, in a private hearing, not so much...

Raskin is a hypocrite. There were a lot of closed door hearings under Pelosi. Now it's a problem. 

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

Let him have his public hearing... after his closed-door deposition.

Agreed. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Billsandhorns said:

Raskin is a hypocrite. There were a lot of closed door hearings under Pelosi. Now it's a problem. 

Agreed. 

Not to mention the selective leaks...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Foxx said:

Raskin

 

 

Raskin knows that in a public hearing, Hunter can decline answers due to national security. He also knows that, in a private hearing, not so much...

 

Question

What was Hunter Bidens Level of clearance at the time?

 

Why was classified material shared with somebody that that was less than honorably discharged from the service and has a documented history of substance abuse and financial problems?

  • Like 4
  • I don't know 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
9 minutes ago, devnull said:

 

Question

What was Hunter Bidens Level of clearance at the time?

 

 

I can't think of a single reason he should have any level of clearance.

 

9 minutes ago, devnull said:

 

Why was classified material shared with somebody that that was less than honorably discharged from the service and has a documented history of substance abuse and financial problems?

 

Funny little fact: substance abuse isn't usually a reason for denying a clearance.  You're far more likely to be denied a clearance for lying about substance abuse than for abusing itself.

  • Like 2
  • Wow 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
1 minute ago, Ann said:


They'll charge him? Really? :classic_dry:

 

They'll more likely charge Trump for selling drugs to Hunter than they will Hunter.

  • Haha 1
  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Funny little fact: substance abuse isn't usually a reason for denying a clearance.  You're far more likely to be denied a clearance for lying about substance abuse than for abusing itself.

 

Coming clean both literally and figuratively won't deny a clearance.  However relapses and repeated abuse will

 

Financial trouble is grounds as is suspicious income from foreign sources

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
5 minutes ago, devnull said:

 

Coming clean both literally and figuratively won't deny a clearance.  However relapses and repeated abuse will

 

Financial trouble is grounds as is suspicious income from foreign sources

 

Which is why I didn't mention financial trouble, did I?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Guidelines