JoshAllen Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Now, I've answered your questions while you've done nothing but dodge so here's your chance to prove you're not a worthless troll. Please defend Kamala's position on First Amendment protections needing to be "looked at" in the name of fighting disinformation. Tell me why you, a "conservative" support this position. Then tell me who you would be comfortable determining what is, and what is not, "misinformation"? The federal government? The state government? A nameless, unaccountable federal commission comprised of unelected academics and bureaucrats? This will be fun to watch you deflect and dodge (again). I recognize that winning arguments online may feel more satisfying than winning elections, but there is no reason to engage with someone who dismisses my view on the former president's suitability for office. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 7 minutes ago, JoshAllen said: I recognize that winning arguments online may feel more satisfying than winning elections, but there is no reason to engage with someone who dismisses my view on the former president's suitability for office. Coward. It'd be more simple to just admit that you can't defend and indefensible position - yet here you are, trying to do so by pretending it doesn't exist. Because you're not a real conservative (not that matters, it just shows you're a liar), and you're here to troll. So &#%$ off. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 2 hours ago, JoshAllen said: I appreciate your passion, but it feels like I'm still hearing justifications rather than answers. My original question was straightforward: Why was Trump able to pass tax cuts but not achieve immigration reform? 4 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 18 minutes ago, bdutton said: He'll be back with his next government sanctioned talking point after his nightly upload... 😉 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 35 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He'll be back with his next government sanctioned talking point after his nightly upload... 😉 stop - engaging -- him 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 Send in the Georgia national guard or state police to oversee. The advice for originals so they can’t turn over doctored docs is good, too. 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 What kind of idiot tries to steal a sign? 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ann said: What kind of idiot tries to steal a sign? I like this idea if you have sign theft and vandalism though the electrified ones work well too Edited October 9 by Cinga 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 This was the woman convicted of saving the Arizona Colorado (as required) when the SOS ordered it destroyed. This thread is wow 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 8 minutes ago, Ann said: This was the woman convicted of saving the Arizona data (as required) when the SOS ordered it destroyed. This thread is wow Tina Peters is Mesa County Colorado not Arizona but yes, this is a HUGE misuse of Justice that I think will soon challenge the idea that a POTUS can't pardon someone from state charges as I expect Trump to try unless Appeals agrees to hear the case 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 1 hour ago, Cinga said: Tina Peters is Mesa County Colorado not Arizona but yes, this is a HUGE misuse of Justice that I think will soon challenge the idea that a POTUS can't pardon someone from state charges as I expect Trump to try unless Appeals agrees to hear the case You are right! Brain warbler. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 Just now, Ann said: You are right! Brain warbler. Happens when you're up so early or so late whichever it is for you! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 58 minutes ago, Cinga said: Happens when you're up so early or so late whichever it is for you! Almost noon 😱 I have no excuse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.