2024 Election Season

[JoshAllen]

8 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Another display of stunning nativity - they literally censored the Hunter Biden laptop story (in order to swing an election their way), not to mention the numerous incidents that happened during Covid. 
 

You can’t say something can’t be done when THEY JUST &#%$ING DID IT…. 

 

Are you comparing the Hunter Biden laptop story to proposals for changing the number of Supreme Court justices and eliminating the Electoral College? That's quite a stretch.

 

Furthermore, you have expressed concerns about both the First Amendment and misinformation, yet it seems you're comfortable with political maneuvering when it aligns with your views, but not when others employ similar tactics.

 

 

 

[JoshAllen]

39 minutes ago, Ann said:

There are a lot of conservatives in this forum.

I know conservatives.

You sir, are no conservative.

 

🙂

 

How so?

 

 

[JoshAllen]

30 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  When Psy Ops and gaslighting become so pervading throughout our system of communication the impact it imparts becomes increasingly less potent.  Something that is lost on most leftists today.  

 

Sure, highlight these psy ops that political parties employ on both sides of the spectrum.

 

 

[Boyst]

1 hour ago, JoshAllen said:

 

I presented factual information to counter your claims about the Supreme Court and the Electoral College. What evidence suggests I'm mistaken? 

 

Regarding the National Popular Vote pact, it's another contentious issue that will face legal challenges and ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court. The Compact Clause (Article I, Section 10, Clause 3) of the Constitution clearly states that no state shall enter into any agreement or compact with another state without the consent of Congress.

 

look at the long play of this. they want to outkick the coverage of the national popular vote pact.

 

if they can get this into effect then they can get liberals to win. the challenges before it gets to SCOTUS are many years. if they can get in office and just replace one conservative judge with another idiot like Kagan or Sotomeyer than they will be able to pack the court to keep their unconstituinal pact. it won't matter what the constitution says because to a liberal it is just an old piece of paper.

 

 

 

it's the long play they are going for and i don't know any regular voting democrat that is not 1 or at least 2 of the following:

1) in agreeance that the constitution can be vacated to protect democracy

2) ignorant, stupid and short sighted to know the ramifactions

3) all of the above with but a Commie or Socialist

[Boyst]

35 minutes ago, JoshAllen said:

 

How so?

 

 

i'll make it easy for you...

what are your conservative positions?

 

if you need some starting bullet points

1) did FEMA spend money on immigration?

2) should the federal government send aid to foreign countries?

3) what is a woman?

4) flutie or johnson?

5) should a president have protected immunity from actions made as president?

6) should the internet be restricted for speech and content?

[JoshAllen]

2 minutes ago, Boyst said:

look at the long play of this. they want to outkick the coverage of the national popular vote pact.

 

if they can get this into effect then they can get liberals to win. the challenges before it gets to SCOTUS are many years. if they can get in office and just replace one conservative judge with another idiot like Kagan or Sotomeyer than they will be able to pack the court to keep their unconstituinal pact. it won't matter what the constitution says because to a liberal it is just an old piece of paper.

 

 

 

it's the long play they are going for and i don't know any regular voting democrat that is not 1 or at least 2 of the following:

1) in agreeance that the constitution can be vacated to protect democracy

2) ignorant, stupid and short sighted to know the ramifactions

3) all of the above with but a Commie or Socialist

 

Democrats failed to get their student loan forgiveness programs through the courts. It's unlikely they'll fare better with this pact. Both sides will say anything to get elected. This is absolutely nothing new in politics.

 

 

 

[IDBillzFan]

Trump opens his hotel to Florida linemen battling the hurricane.

 

Tua's wife likes that.

 

And once again we see that I could never be a Democrat because I could never agree to being this openly hateful and stupid.

 

 

[JoshAllen]

3 minutes ago, Boyst said:

if you need some starting bullet points

1) did FEMA spend money on immigration?

2) should the federal government send aid to foreign countries?

3) what is a woman?

4) flutie or johnson?

5) should a president have protected immunity from actions made as president?

6) should the internet be restricted for speech and content?

 

1) Yes. Do I agree? No.

2) Foreign aid is valid as long as it is allocated to countries that align, protect and preserve our economic and political interest, security, and alliances.

3) 2 x chromosomes

4) Who needs a big Johnson when you have a little Flutie?

5) While in office? Some autonomy, yes, but complete? No. I don't trust either political party with that much power and defeats the purpose of checks and balances.

6) No.

[IDBillzFan]

46 minutes ago, JoshAllen said:

 

Sure, highlight these psy ops that political parties employ on both sides of the spectrum.

 

 

 

Okay, since you're playing the middle of the road, can you let us know why you believe Harris will make a good president.

 

One caveat: the answer can not be her campaign slogan, which is "I'm not Trump."

 

And go.

[Boyst]

31 minutes ago, JoshAllen said:

 

Democrats failed to get their student loan forgiveness programs through the courts. It's unlikely they'll fare better with this pact. Both sides will say anything to get elected. This is absolutely nothing new in politics.

 

 

 

 

 

the student loan forgiveness programs were never designed to succeed. not all of them. but they were political ammunition and more important ammunition to fire and start to shred holes into the fabric of legal frameworks to make it possible

[Deranged Rhino]

1 hour ago, JoshAllen said:

 

Are you comparing the Hunter Biden laptop story to proposals for changing the number of Supreme Court justices and eliminating the Electoral College?

 

 

No. I used that specifically to counter your absurd and false argument that censorship “will never happen”. 
 

Of course you know this, and can’t defend it, so you deflect and lie. 
 

Because you’re a troll and most assuredly not being honest. So &#%$ off,  bye now 👋 

[Ann]

 

[JoshAllen]

24 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Okay, since you're playing the middle of the road, can you let us know why you believe Harris will make a good president.

 

One caveat: the answer can not be her campaign slogan, which is "I'm not Trump."

 

And go.

 

While I have reservations about Kamala Harris, I don't believe she poses a threat to our democratic institutions. Moreover, my stock portfolio and investments are performing exceptionally well.

 

And now for the part you might find uncomfortable but factual: Trump hasn't secured a victory since 2016. His actions led to the loss of Republican control in the House, Senate, and White House and in 2022 there was no traditional/historical midterm effect that opposing parties enjoy. Trump can't win us elections anymore, and he has broken the public's trust. The Republican party has to return to its roots if it wants to win.

[Deranged Rhino]

3 minutes ago, JoshAllen said:

 

While I have reservations about Kamala Harris, I don't believe she poses a threat to our democratic institutions.

 

Says the dishonest troll who ignores reality in order to virtue signal. 
 

Asshat. 

[IDBillzFan]

2 minutes ago, JoshAllen said:

 

While I have reservations about Kamala Harris, I don't believe she poses a threat to our democratic institutions. Moreover, my stock portfolio and investments are performing exceptionally well.

 

And now for the part you might find uncomfortable but factual: Trump hasn't secured a victory since 2016. His actions led to the loss of Republican control in the House, Senate, and White House and in 2022 there was no traditional/historical midterm effect that opposing parties enjoy. Trump can't win us elections anymore, and he has broken the public's trust. The Republican party has to return to its roots if it wants to win.

 

 

Let me get this right: the woman who's administration spent the last three years sending its DOJ after its political opponent is no threat to our democratic institutions? Really? That's the thought here? The same administration that has imprisoned a bunch of protesters while importing hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans and Haitian criminals? 

 

THAT protection of our democracy? 

 

And now you want the Republican party to return to its roots? What roots would they be? You mean the Cheneys? Mitch McConnell? Paul Ryan? Mitt Romney? All the GOP people who literally abandoned their principles to team with Biden Harris to weaponize the DOJ so Trump doesn't go back to breaking up their perma-war money train?

 

Do you even follow politics?

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Let me get this right: the woman who's administration spent the last three years sending its DOJ after its political opponent is no threat to our democratic institutions? Really? That's the thought here? The same administration that has imprisoned a bunch of protesters while importing hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans and Haitian criminals? 

 

THAT protection of our democracy? 

 

And now you want the Republican party to return to its roots? What roots would they be? You mean the Cheneys? Mitch McConnell? Paul Ryan? Mitt Romney? All the GOP people who literally abandoned their principles to team with Biden Harris to weaponize the DOJ so Trump doesn't go back to breaking up their perma-war money train?

 

Do you even follow politics?

He is not being honest. He’s trolling. And he’s terrible at it. 
 

And if I’m wrong and he’s being sincere, then he’s part of the NPC brigade that got us into this position and isn’t worth conversing with. He’s toxic and needs to be made to feel ashamed for his low IQ, piss poor understanding of reality. 

[IDBillzFan]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

He is not being honest. He’s trolling. And he’s terrible at it. 
 

And if I’m wrong and he’s being sincere, then he’s part of the NPC brigade that got us into this position and isn’t worth conversing with. He’s toxic and needs to be made to feel ashamed for his low IQ, piss poor understanding of reality. 

 

I know, but I had a few minutes and we haven't had a troll here since the other dudes split town, so I wanted to engage a bit.

 

In the end, no rational human being can listen to Kamala Harris, especially these past couple of weeks where she is literally getting throat stomped by Biden at every turn, and think she is capable of leading a lemonade stand, let along a country.

 

She has proven to be, by far, the absolutely dumbest human I've ever see run for office off a teleprompter. I mean, absolutely mind-numbingly stupid. The questions she FUBAR'ed on the View and Colbert are just incredibly embarrassing.

 

It's like someone asking you in an interview"Where do you see yourself in five years?" and you respond with "Gee, I never thought about that question coming into this interview."

[Ann]

 

 

[JoshAllen]

21 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

No. I used that specifically to counter your absurd and false argument that censorship “will never happen”. 

 

Don't conflate censorship with misinformation. While related, these concepts are distinct.

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

8 minutes ago, JoshAllen said:

 

Don't conflate censorship with misinformation. While related, these concepts are distinct.

 

 

More deflections. 
 

Only one party is running on a platform of “looking at the first amendment” to fight “disinformation”. And it’s the party that has throttled conservative voices and views on social media, censored REAL news stories to push propaganda designed to help their candidates, and of course that’s the party you - a self avowed “conservative” are supporting because…. 
 

(checks Asshat’s notes…)

 

”It will never happen”. 
 

You’re not even a good troll. But you are a fun punching bag. Keep going, you’re doing the Lord’s work here.