Jump to content
Bills Fans Gear Now Available! ×

Trump Assassination Attempt, July 13, 2024 Butler PA and Florida


Ann

Recommended Posts

bdutton
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Naw, it's fine! That kind of stuff would never happen! 

 

 

1. It's not unusual for law enforcement and general public to share a range. It's actually pretty much standard.

2. I believe that the USSS does not have the comms because the FBI has it for their investigation. 

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deranged Rhino
3 minutes ago, bdutton said:

1. It's not unusual for law enforcement and general public to share a range. It's actually pretty much standard.

2. I believe that the USSS does not have the comms because the FBI has it for their investigation. 

 

No doubt to both - but, can we actually trust the FBI considering they spent the past 8 years literally inventing crimes to persecute and overthrow the man they're not tasked with investigating his assassination attempt? 

 

I sure don't. 

 

Both things are simultaneously normal and stink to high heaven - all because the Bureau burned its own reputation to the ground with the 7th floor's desire to play politics and save their own asses from criminal exposure (for routinely circumventing FISA - which is what brought us here in the first place way back when). 

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ninety-4

Cheatle has 29 years of gov service.  30 is probably a nice pension sweetener.  She's not going anywhere willingly.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ann said:

 

 

IF that is accurate, the people claiming the shooter was acting alone just found themselves a much tougher slog to prove it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
3 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

IF that is accurate, the people claiming the shooter was acting alone just found themselves a much tougher slog to prove it.

 

e6e7ccf7-e4cf-4329-b8c1-ebba7ac8a7f0_tex

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle admitted to using encrypted apps on her personal cell phone to communicate with colleagues in the federal government and overseas. Rep. Eric Burlison was stunned, stating this might constitute a federal crime. Cheatle hurriedly clarified that she would never do exactly what she had just admitted to. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's request for Chairman Comer to bring perjury charges against Cheatle now seems well-founded. Cheatle's testimony has been evasive and self-contradictory, leading Congress members from both sides to call for her resignation.
 

 

  • Popcorn 2
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bdutton
51 minutes ago, Ann said:

 

 

And???

 

All of these things are actually believable I pointed out already they law enforcement and public frequently use the same ranges.

 

I would HOPE that the director of the USSS is using encrypted comms on her phone for voice and text.

 

I am not buying ANY of this conspiracy bullshit.  The USSS &#%$ed up and dropped the ball and got lucky.

 

Period.

  • O Rly 1
  • Yes and No 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
9 minutes ago, bdutton said:

 

And???

 

All of these things are actually believable I pointed out already they law enforcement and public frequently use the same ranges.

 

I would HOPE that the director of the USSS is using encrypted comms on her phone for voice and text.

 

I am not buying ANY of this conspiracy bullshit.  The USSS &#%$ed up and dropped the ball and got lucky.

 

Period.

 

PERSONAL phone.  That's the key takeaway, not whether or not it's encrypted.  She shouldn't be using it at all.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Cheers 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bdutton
21 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

PERSONAL phone.  That's the key takeaway, not whether or not it's encrypted.  She shouldn't be using it at all.

Not a conspiracy and modern tech allows for personal phones to be used for business purposes provided they have adequate security installed on them.  

 

ETA... this isn't 1995 anymore.

Edited by bdutton
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
25 minutes ago, bdutton said:

Not a conspiracy and modern tech allows for personal phones to be used for business purposes provided they have adequate security installed on them.  

 

ETA... this isn't 1995 anymore.

 

Modern technology might allow it, but federal law does not allow the use of personal equipment for government use.  I get trained on this every single &#%$ing year.  

  • Like 1
  • Popcorn 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bdutton
6 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Modern technology might allow it, but federal law does not allow the use of personal equipment for government use.  I get trained on this every single &#%$ing year.  

I doubt that the federal law applies to the top brass... even if it should they wont and at least she's using encrypted apps which are probably cleared.  At least she's not keeping un-encrypted emails on a server in her bathroom.

 

BTW... I am sure if the NSA/FBI needed access to the encrypted message they already do.  We just need to reign in those agencies to obey the law.

  • O Rly 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bdutton said:

I doubt that the federal law applies to the top brass... even if it should they wont and at least she's using encrypted apps which are probably cleared.  At least she's not keeping un-encrypted emails on a server in her bathroom.

 

BTW... I am sure if the NSA/FBI needed access to the encrypted message they already do.  We just need to reign in those agencies to obey the law.


It was illegal. 

  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fansince88
5 hours ago, Ann said:

 

In the past I was saying 4 or 5 12 pitch. I would like to rescind that and say 2/12 or 3/12

  • Like 1
  • Popcorn 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4merper4mer
2 hours ago, bdutton said:

Not a conspiracy and modern tech allows for personal phones to be used for business purposes provided they have adequate security installed on them.  

 

ETA... this isn't 1995 anymore.

What other shit prohibited by federal law do you find meh?  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dr. who
2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

What other shit prohibited by federal law do you find meh?  

Probably a sliding scale depending on whether you have a D or an R after your name.

  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Guidelines